HP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87B7
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210922
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 10:09
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3020e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Memory 15.8
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 54.6
27% 45.9 Pts
4-Core 55.2
8-Core 57.4
7% 56.3 Pts
64-Core 60.6
4% 60.6 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 87B7) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.40.38
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.1
3% 2.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLH128HBHQ-000H1 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 195 204 204 175 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 319
Write 275
Mixed 264
SusWrite 194
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 18.9
62% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 91.9
70% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 98%
SDHC Card 16GB
14GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.6
Write 16.2
Mixed 15.7
24% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.2
62% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.M8FR 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 353
11% 353 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14s-fq0xxx Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback