Intel Alder Lake-H PCH (ERYING G660 ITX)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 168%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardIntel Alder Lake-H PCH (ERYING G660 ITX)  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 20:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 74.1
1-Core 186
2-Core 366
108% 209 Pts
4-Core 689
8-Core 1,177
113% 933 Pts
64-Core 2,062
128% 2,062 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3769 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 219
Parallax 203
178% 214 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 158
Splatting 141
136% 171 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 587 628 596 1855 3482 3402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2,025
Write 3,322
Mixed 2292
SusWrite 1,758
532% 2,349 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 3.3
167% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 302
246% 346 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 249%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Netac Co Ltd 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 33.4
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 27.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 31.5" 1280 720 @@M0000 XGM32
Typical Alder Lake-H PCH (ERYING G660 ITX) Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel Alder Lake-H PCH (ERYING G660 ITX)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback