Asrock X79 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 13:32
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 189
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 570
58% 471 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2148 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 77.2
Reflection 81.2
Parallax 74.5
63% 77.6 fps
MRender 73.2
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 72.7
61% 74.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$86
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 158 148 147 125 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 440
Write 320
Mixed 208
SusWrite 143
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 33.1
106% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 183
144% 199 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 100%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
617GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1815 1841 1607 1474 1500 1486 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,086
Write 1,897
Mixed 1,567
SusWrite 1,621
403% 1,793 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 49.5
160% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 228
175% 239 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 243%
Great: 410%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 177 177 176 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 111
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 176
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 94%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 9 60 72.3" 1536 811 SAN0206 SANYO-TV
Typical X79 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme6 - $341

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $726
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback