Asrock X79 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 22:01
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 166
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 330
38% 299 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2104 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 80
Parallax 81.3
62% 79.2 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 64.5
55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$77
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 196 166 178 169 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 421
Write 288
Mixed 255
SusWrite 185
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 36.8
132% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 237
199% 291 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83%
Great: 100%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
628GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1910 1836 1573 1473 1413 1445 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,201
Write 2,038
Mixed 1,656
SusWrite 1,608
421% 1,876 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 68
216% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 476
357% 479 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 275%
Great: 410%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 172 176 176 172 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 136
Write 114
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 175
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 1R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 9% 95 216 60 60 72.3" 1536 864 SAN0206 SANYO-TV
Typical X79 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme6 - $341

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $722
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback