Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 05:53
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 226
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 322
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 512GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2818E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 385 414 413 310 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 472
Write 421
Mixed 371
SusWrite 345
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 9.9
91% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 13.2
36% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate USB 1TB
844GB free, PID a0a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 206 208 207 205 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 202
Write 192
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 204
228% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 79%
Seagate USB 500GB
263GB free, PID a0a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 60 61 64 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 67.5
Write 54.2
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 62
72% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G6E1 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 4.6
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 21%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 13% 15 207 58 75 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-H310M DS2 2.0 Builds (Compare 908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback