Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Memory 39.9 1-Core 58.7 2-Core 78.4 36% 59 Pts	4-Core 82 8-Core 72.4 10% 77.2 Pts	64-Core 74.5 5% 74.5 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 9840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 1.9 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Neo Forza NSN135SA348-I01S400 480GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227F SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 110 205 257 167 69 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.4% Average	Read 382 Write 370 Mixed 222 SusWrite 157 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 7.5 63% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 94.4 DQ Mixed 15.2 42% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO480E85-2666E 1x8GB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
29%	11%	79	34	5	60	11.6"	1280 720	STA8CA7

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	12x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	12x

SSD
480GB 480GBKimtigoBench 63%, 25 samples	6x
Forza NSN135SA348-I01S400 480GBNeoBench 52%, 3 samples	4x
Forza NSN125SA348-H03Q200 480GBNeoBench 60%, 2 samples	1x

RAM
NMSO480E82-2666E 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 42 samples	5x
NMSO480E85-2666E 1x8GBUnknownBench 36%, 145 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x