Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171017
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 11:18
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 60
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 121
48% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 395
37% 309 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.43 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS256GD9TNG-62A 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 242 135 129 102 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 738
Write 582
Mixed 312
SusWrite 163
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 21.1
76% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 250
192% 258 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 158%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB16GS2400.C16E 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 22 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO61ED
Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback