Acer Predator PH517-51

Performance Results

Gaming 107%
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 100%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Cayman_CFS
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 02:00
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 85.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 744
70% 580 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 222
Parallax 166
140% 187 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 145
Splatting 128
122% 152 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 127%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40000E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 911 901 910 906 912 906 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,346
Write 891
Mixed 790
SusWrite 908
220% 984 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 41.1
137% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 743
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 538
428% 604 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 180%
Great: 225%
CT4000P3SSD8 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1662 1860 1872 1773 1861 1767 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,607
Write 1,885
Mixed 1,724
SusWrite 1799
397% 1,754 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 46.1
151% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 678
492% 646 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 249%
Great: 426%
Sandisk S3 4T00 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 357 374 381 369 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 441
Write 421
Mixed 349
SusWrite 376
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 27.8
109% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 232
186% 259 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 27.3
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM05E8 SyncMaster
Typical Predator PH517-51 Builds (Compare 591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 56%
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 49%

System: Acer Predator PH517-51

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback