Toshiba Satellite P75-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite P75-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateDec 27 '17 at 15:21
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 195
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 506
56% 443 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA72) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.54
Parallax 6.66
3% 5.7 fps
MRender 8.48
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.43
5% 6.09 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 256GB-$194
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN263 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 484
Write 214
Mixed 264
70% 321 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 19.1
110% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 18.6
45% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
187GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 70.7
Mixed 80
55% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.26
72% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B1G73CB0-YK0 M471B5173BH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.5% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite P75-A Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite P75-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback