Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory15.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 17:41
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 322
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8421) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 26
18% 23.6 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 23.9
22% 27.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 37 37 36 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 392
Write 389
Mixed 302
SusWrite 70.4
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 34.8
115% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 225
192% 285 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 118%
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB-$79
32GB free
Firmware: M208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 158 177 177 201 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 158
Write 161
Mixed 152
SusWrite 180
37% 163 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 17
67% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 143
112% 156 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 45%
Great: 95%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
113GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 334 353 349 371 378 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 405
Write 392
Mixed 364
SusWrite 357
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 39.7
131% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 355
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
423GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 28 28 60 40 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 51.7
Write 28.4
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 36.8
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 27 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7785 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,096 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $851
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback