Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 11:02
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 164
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 378
41% 324 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
PNY(196E 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 42.9
Parallax 38.7
33% 40.8 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 34
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 181 126 179 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49% Average
Read 210
Write 194
Mixed 197
SusWrite 159
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 25.2
94% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 44.5
DQ Write 51.9
DQ Mixed 54.9
40% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 49%
Great: 117%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
111GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 89 88 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 62.8
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 88.5
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
78GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 126 127 126 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 193
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 127
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 22 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0C1E T22E390
Typical P8H61-M LE/USB3 Builds (Compare 640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback