Asus PRIME H310M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-C  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 01:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 859
83% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Gigabyte(1458 40F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 198
Parallax 218
179% 212 fps
MRender 221
Gravity 171
Splatting 127
136% 173 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 152%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3105A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 147 18 47 224 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 445
Write 409
Mixed 334
SusWrite 153
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 11
80% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 15.2
65% 141 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 19
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 20.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 30 120 27" 1280 720 HAN2700 NXM27CRV01
Typical PRIME H310M-C Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback