Asus Mini ITX Scan

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAsus Mini ITX Scan  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-I R2.0
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 11 '23 at 23:55
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 30.7
2-Core 61.7
34% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 73.6
8-Core 104
11% 88.9 Pts
64-Core 78.7
5% 78.7 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 36.2
29% 36.6 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 26.3
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 54 51 46 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 156
Write 7.5
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 47.4
40% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
67% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
77GB free
Firmware: GH2OA420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 68 62 55 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41% Average
Read 84
Write 83.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 59
45% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41%
Great: 72%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
607GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 24 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 25.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 25.4
23% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 21%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 14 120 21.5" 1280 720 DEL4050 Alienware2210
Typical Mini ITX Scan Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Asus Mini ITX Scan

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $603
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback