Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI_GU604VI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI_GU604VI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU604VI
Memory18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '23 at 08:01
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 64.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 250
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 669
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 1,077
67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1473) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 150
Parallax 141
104% 140 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 109
Splatting 104
102% 128 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 103%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,173
Write 1,475
Mixed 1,166
285% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 32.9
162% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 565
411% 543 MB/s
Poor: 151% Great: 356%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88MEBSA095N 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 26.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 15.9" 1280 720 BOE0B74 NE160QDM-NM4
Typical ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI_GU604VI Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI_GU604VI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback