Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 167%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime38.1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '23 at 03:15
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$189
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 68.9
1-Core 185
2-Core 349
104% 201 Pts
4-Core 686
8-Core 1,189
114% 938 Pts
64-Core 1,942
120% 1,942 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
MSI(1462 5052) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 237
Reflection 209
Parallax 202
193% 216 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 162
Splatting 134
141% 180 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 161%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
56GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 238 180 180 175 180 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 845
Write 164
Mixed 337
SusWrite 194
84% 385 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 37.6
139% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 325
339% 592 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 120%
Great: 354%
Nvme WDC WDS500G1B0C-00S6U0 500GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 167 153 158 167 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 766
Write 370
Mixed 385
SusWrite 167
93% 422 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 39.5
139% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 878
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 533
428% 614 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 113%
Great: 244%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
79GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 110 92 104 87 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 48.6
Write 79.4
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 97.9
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.4
150% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 90%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 176 183 183 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 171
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 180
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.7
324% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 33 120 34.8" 1280 720 DELA1E4 Dell AW3423DW
Typical TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 1,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $825
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback