Gigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 14:32
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 178
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 516
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 154
Parallax 143
115% 146 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 143
Splatting 127
110% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 266 275 274 275 274 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 436
Mixed 326
SusWrite 284
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 40.1
137% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 225
201% 304 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 118%
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
144GB free
Firmware: CS900E13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 155 155 237 186 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.2% Below average
Read 199
Write 95.3
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 190
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 14.2
58% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 25.3
DQ Mixed 23.8
18% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD340C81-1333CA 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 20" 1280 720 ACR00C5 Acer P205H
Typical GA-B85M-DS3H-A Builds (Compare 1,229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback