HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16.1GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16.1GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

12 months ago, 7 months ago, 4 months ago, 3 months ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8309
Memory	16.1 GB free of 16.0625 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200708
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '23 at 22:40
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 69.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 213 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 713 68% 560 Pts	64-Core 1089 67% 1089 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Zotac(19DA 2511) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 118 Parallax 136 110% 129 fps	MRender 179 Gravity 129 Splatting 108 110% 139 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 478 Write 373 Mixed 381 91% 411 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 31.2 100% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 240 180% 243 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 221GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 507 168 846 411 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 305GB free Firmware: AP25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 115 114 115 115 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 111 Write 107 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 112 72% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2400, 3200, 2400 MHz 8192, 64, 8192 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.2% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 13.3 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	64	53	120	48.8"	3413 897	SAM0F9C C49RG9x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	518x
Core i7-7700KIntel $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	225x
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	222x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	330x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	235x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	143x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	170x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	87x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	72x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	205x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	137x
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 2,884 samples	78x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $445

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16