Asrock H61M-VG3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG3  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateOct 09 '23 at 18:58
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 149
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 403
43% 341 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37240G 480GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 231 235 137 3.1 2.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 239
Write 151
Mixed 227
SusWrite 139
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 31.4
112% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 144
121% 174 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
343GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 152 152 151 153 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 145
Write 90
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 151
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 112%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 56 57 55 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 58.2
Write 46.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 55.6
68% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 59%
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB
913GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 24 25 24 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 57.6
Write 26.8
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 25.5
38% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
10% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 21%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 94 95 94 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 112
Write 84.7
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 95.3
118% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.7
252% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA1339.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 8 60 22" 1280 720 GSM5636 L226WA
Typical H61M-VG3 Builds (Compare 1,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG3 - $55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback