Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '23 at 15:32
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 110
2-Core 196
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 509
47% 394 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 140F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.4% Very good
Lighting 88.3
Reflection 95.2
Parallax 89.8
72% 91.1 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 79.8
Splatting 79.3
76% 95.7 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 83%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 22.3
13% 16.9 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 13.7
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 724 500 404 395 447 405 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 924
Write 928
Mixed 884
SusWrite 479
181% 804 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 41.6
136% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 621
438% 548 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 131%
Great: 181%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
749GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 377 386 385 406 413 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 366
Mixed 381
SusWrite 381
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 46.6
143% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 247
186% 248 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 25
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 20
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 13.3" 1280 720 WAC1070 Wacom One 13
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV Builds (Compare 699 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback