Alienware M17xR3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware M17xR3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M17xR3
Memory7.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '17 at 02:52
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 394
43% 341 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Dell(1028 04BA) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.54
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.52 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.48
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM02D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47% Average
Read 258
Write 246
Mixed 253
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 10.2
51% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 9.74
44% 100 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47%
Great: 80%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
466GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 97.2
Mixed 88.9
71% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.28
76% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-PB HMT325S6BFR8C-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT325S6BFR8C-PB 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 9.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M17xR3 Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M17xR3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $294
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback