Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_TUF706HM

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	8.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_TUF706HM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX706HM
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '23 at 16:56
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11800H 56,029 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 70.5 1-Core 156 2-Core 296 92% 174 Pts	4-Core 583 8-Core 1,007 96% 795 Pts	64-Core 1,320 82% 1,320 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 141C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.34% Terrible	Lighting 9.5 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 11.2 8% 12.5 fps	MRender 12.9 Gravity 12.2 Splatting 10.3 10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TB 3,489 User benchmarks, average bench 208% 843GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 983 837 816 852 871 865 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	191% Outstanding	Read 1,353 Write 1299 Mixed 1,106 SusWrite 871 260% 1,157 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 59.1 194% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 773 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 595 418% 542 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 289%
SAMSUNG HM160HC 160GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	8.74% Terrible	Read 49.7 Write 6.7 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 6.7 16% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.74% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GB 7,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 12.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 14 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	144	17.3"	1280 720	BOE0A11

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_TUF706HM Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_TUF706HM

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	293x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	124x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	195x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	156x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	66x

SSD
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBNvmeBench 229%, 5,082 samples	122x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00BTW 1TBNvmeBench 203%, 1,004 samples	90x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	73x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	172x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	77x
M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 7,175 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16