Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemGigabyte H370HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 08 '23 at 00:44
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 660
70% 561 Pts
64-Core 537
33% 537 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.65% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 14
Parallax 9.1
10% 11.6 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 10.4
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 9.65%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,336
Write 24.7
Mixed 65.4
306% 1,475 MB/s
4K Read 482
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 4.1
738% 163 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 71%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
898GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 122 125 124 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 141
Write 111
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 123
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 04CB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.6% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 17 120 27" 1920 1017 DEL41E7 DELL S2721HGF
Typical GA-H370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback