Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120326
Uptime23.6 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 11:36
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 180
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 337
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Gainward(10B0 0FC8) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.12% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 11.7
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 390 387 421 422 332 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 377
Mixed 400
SusWrite 389
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 45.1
145% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 272
226% 326 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 123%
Adata XPG EX500 250GB
77GB free
Firmware: 9301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 33 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 20.6
Write 30.4
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 32.9
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHLC0CF PHL 223V5
Typical GA-H67MA-USB3-B3 Builds (Compare 557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback