HP ENVY x360 2-in-1 Laptop 13-bf0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ENVY x360 2-in-1 Laptop 13-bf0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A28
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 06 '23 at 15:42
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-1230U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 153
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 445
42% 346 Pts
64-Core 857
53% 857 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8A28) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
9.72% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 11.8
10% 12.7 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 10.1
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.72%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NGXH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,737
Write 753
Mixed 1,407
287% 1,299 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 49.3
169% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 305
213% 274 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 400%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H54G66CYRBX275N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 56.2
MC Mixed 47.2
139% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 24.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 13.3" 1280 720 LGD0723
Typical ENVY x360 2-in-1 Laptop 13-bf0xxx Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP ENVY x360 2-in-1 Laptop 13-bf0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback