PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120320 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 05 '23 at 18:46 |
Run Duration | 211 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600-$192
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
59%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
Gigabyte(1458 226D) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22Z3V4EI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 66 56 66 34 47 MB/s
|
40.2%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
68GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 81 82 83 82 80 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
501GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 116 117 116 116 MB/s
|
64.6%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$78
634GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 68 56 66 34 48 MB/s
|
53.2%
Above average
|
|||
49.5%
Average
|
||||
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 4TB
391GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 158 160 161 161 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 68 | 55 | 72 | 27" | 1280 720 | SAM0D32 C27F390 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 179x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 144x |
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 110x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 41x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 39x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 35x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $698 |