Asus N55SF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N55SF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N55SF
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '23 at 01:30
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 142
59% 98 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 345
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 2050) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
806GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 200 196 191 190 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 454
Write 405
Mixed 302
SusWrite 212
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 25.1
87% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 191
183% 289 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G13332S 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 37 60 15.5" 1280 720 SEC314C
Typical N55SF Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N55SF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback