bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DZ68BC
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 23:18
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 84
2-Core 167
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 305
39% 298 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 40.9
Parallax 38.4
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 27.3
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 340 386 413 411 423 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 337
Write 352
Mixed 347
SusWrite 375
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 33.6
111% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 148
137% 217 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 123%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
188GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 203 217 231 235 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 194
Write 212
Mixed 205
SusWrite 216
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 30.5
102% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 104
101% 159 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 123%
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
30GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 142 154 162 166 167 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.5% Average
Read 273
Write 108
Mixed 145
SusWrite 152
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 22.9
73% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 108
85% 117 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 115%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
16GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 357
Write 406
Mixed 287
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 38.3
125% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 159
151% 241 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 24" 1280 720 AUS24A1 VG245
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback