HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory30.3 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 22:12
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 217
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 527
58% 457 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 18
Parallax 20.1
16% 19.5 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 578 325 327 321 317 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,366
Write 1,060
Mixed 786
SusWrite 364
199% 894 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 53.6
175% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 602
442% 585 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 157%
Great: 259%
Netac 250GB 250GB
53GB free
Firmware: S1206A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 111 74 46 76 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 407
Write 355
Mixed 364
SusWrite 95.4
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 21.4
97% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 44.9
94% 187 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 96%
Mengmi 240GB 240GB
41GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 325 283 213 260 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 404
Write 352
Mixed 304
SusWrite 261
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 41.5
133% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 102
141% 258 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 109%
SSD 240GB
153GB free
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 132 130 130 132 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 393
Write 303
Mixed 317
SusWrite 158
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 31
115% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 218
189% 279 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 M378A2K43CB1-CRC Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 4096, 16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.4% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 25.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 22.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 26 60 26.4" 1280 720 AOC2752 2752
Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback