QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 17:15
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 82.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 255
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 838
80% 660 Pts
64-Core 874
54% 874 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 263
Parallax 322
216% 284 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 242
Splatting 189
206% 262 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 190%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 322GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1225 852 610 597 633 607 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 89%
Qemu HARDDISK 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 79 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 129
Write 88.7
Mixed 68
SusWrite 80.7
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
208% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 79%
Qemu HARDDISK 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 75 76 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 118
Write 94.6
Mixed 115
SusWrite 76
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
230% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 23.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 100 31.5" 1280 720 VSCDE35 VX3258 series
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback