Acer Aspire ES1-311

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-311  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire ES1-311
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N3540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 44.5
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 47.3
26% 38.5 Pts
4-Core 65.8
8-Core 63.3
9% 64.6 Pts
64-Core 67
4% 67 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 0938) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 205 203 207 172 194 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.2% Above average
Read 182
Write 191
Mixed 197
SusWrite 195
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 27
81% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 94
DQ Mixed 119
90% 121 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 17 60 13.2" 1280 720 AUO132C
Typical Aspire ES1-311 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback