TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN16-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN16-41  (all builds)
MotherboardRB Sierra_PEH
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 13:42
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 167
2-Core 321
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 973
96% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,235
76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 92.7%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 3925 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 108
114% 112 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 92.5
Splatting 83.9
84% 107 fps
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 113%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2015 752 753 753 766 767 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 4,112
Write 3,395
Mixed 2402
SusWrite 968
605% 2,719 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 80.6
279% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,142
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 1,068
764% 988 MB/s
Poor: 204% ↑
This bench: 352%
 Great: 420%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
310GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1899 1138 349 377 422 428 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,565
Write 1,968
Mixed 1727
SusWrite 769
340% 1,507 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 63.9
212% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,136
DQ Write 980
DQ Mixed 1075
801% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑
This bench: 222%
 Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
113% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 46.7
MC Mixed 37.8
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 48.3
SC Mixed 29
98% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 101% ↑
This bench: 113%
 Great: 136%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 4R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 40% 43 215 59 165 16" 1536 960 CMN1616
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN16-41 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Acer Nitro AN16-41

CPU
Ryzen 7 7840HSAMDBench 84%, 1,015 samples15x
Ryzen 5 7535HS GraphicsAMDBench 82%, 2,625 samples6x
Ryzen 7 7735HSAMDBench 79%, 3,338 samples4x
GPU
RTX 4070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 132%, 10,174 samples8x
Radeon 780MAMDBench 36%, 1,815 samples8x
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 27%, 25,679 samples5x
SSD
HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TBBench 415%, 184 samples10x
HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GBBench 313%, 151 samples7x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TBSamsungBench 348%, 434 samples2x
RAM
HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GBHynixBench 152%, 5,144 samples6x
HMCG78AGBSA095N 1x16GBHynixBench 82%, 692 samples6x
HMCG66AGBSA095N 2x8GBHynixBench 129%, 2,777 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback