Asrock X570 Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive360% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 13:42
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 290
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 917
91% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,457
90% 1,457 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
ASRock(1849 5217) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 139
Parallax 174
74% 135 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 93.1
Splatting 164
126% 154 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 1TB
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82C6U67A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1849 1857 1213 1169 664 676 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 3,081
Write 1,964
Mixed 1,684
SusWrite 1,238
443% 1,992 MB/s
4K Read 77.8
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 104
343% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,342
DQ Write 1,091
DQ Mixed 1,194
900% 1,209 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 360%
Great: 458%
T-force TM8FP8002T 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: V9002s65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1158 1154 1079 1173 1121 1096 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,621
Write 1,138
Mixed 938
SusWrite 1130
270% 1,207 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 48.8
191% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 392
328% 453 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 214%
Great: 274%
Seagate ST8000NC0002-1XX112 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: CN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 224 222 224 223 223 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 194 193 188 192 194 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 224 218 228 222 224 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 197
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 224
127% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 128%
Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 179 182 179 180 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 120
Write 134
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 178
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.6
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 26.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27A4 VN279
Typical X570 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,050
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback