Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110823
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 12:07
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 47.2
1-Core 85
2-Core 175
55% 103 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 334
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
Asus(1043 04BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.3% Below average
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 55.5
Parallax 58.9
31% 50.7 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 46.8
Splatting 41
38% 47.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dexp C100 128Gb 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0406B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 200 202 210 198 106 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 194
Write 182
Mixed 186
SusWrite 186
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 17.2
81% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 85.7
DQ Mixed 20.7
27% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 116 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 115
70% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 16 60 23.8" 1280 720 XMI23CB Mi Monitor
Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback