Asus H110M-D

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-D (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170316
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 02 '23 at 15:01
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$40 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 187 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 261 35% 260 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 40 Parallax 37.1 29% 37.5 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 26.7 27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 162 146 15 71 168 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 406 Write 272 Mixed 320 SusWrite 130 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 34.3 123% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 206 178% 261 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 90%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50 17,310 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 893GB free Firmware: CV22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 185 147 23 18 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 158 Write 165 Mixed 80.9 SusWrite 98.5 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	MC Read 26 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.3 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 22.9 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 66.1 61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	24	3	60	23"	1920 1017	ACI23E1 ASUS VX239

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	420x
Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	241x
Core i5-6400Intel $69Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	220x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	286x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	220x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	196x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	160x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	83x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	59x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	35x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16