Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 03:57
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BHR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 256
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 724
70% 574 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Gainward(10B0 2208) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 5125 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 275
Reflection 298
Parallax 327
224% 300 fps
MRender 275
Gravity 216
Splatting 152
168% 214 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 184%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 757 615 623 606 475 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,846
Write 1,678
Mixed 652
SusWrite 581
264% 1,189 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 49.2
166% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 653
DQ Mixed 716
548% 746 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 195%
Great: 254%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
112GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 400 454 460 467 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 466
Mixed 455
SusWrite 430
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 52.9
177% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 137
Write 128
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 116
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.7
236% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 30.8
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 28.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 31.7" 1918 2080 SAM72C2 Odyssey G7
Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback