Lenovo 30FMCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive451% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory72GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 72GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemLenovo 30FMCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1057
Memory63.3 GB free of 72 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 02:37
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 66.9
1-Core 205
2-Core 410
115% 227 Pts
4-Core 802
8-Core 1,463
136% 1,132 Pts
64-Core 2,302
142% 2,302 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Legend(17AA 1057) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 10.6
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3394 3431 3449 1254 657 662 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
451% Outstanding
Read 2,899
Write 3,582
Mixed 2,765
SusWrite 2141
642% 2,847 MB/s
4K Read 80.9
4K Write 243
4K Mixed 118
402% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1873
DQ Write 1,689
DQ Mixed 1,804
1,347% 1,789 MB/s
Poor: 267%
This bench: 451%
Great: 453%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 23R1GB4BB0-CQKOD Micron C2085S1UC48BA1 Micron C2085S1UC48BA1 71GB
4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 35.4
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 25.7
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F96 U32R59x
Typical 30FMCTO1WW Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30FMCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback