Medion Crawler E30

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion Crawler E30  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPx0PNK
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 00:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 65.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 345
100% 194 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 939
96% 778 Pts
64-Core 1,332
82% 1,332 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 866D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71% Very good
Lighting 96
Reflection 85
Parallax 84.8
78% 88.6 fps
MRender 77.3
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 64.4
57% 70.5 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-512G-PHISON-SSD-B47R 512GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 706 341 672 471 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 816
Write 832
Mixed 618
SusWrite 549
158% 704 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 44.9
254% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 576
DQ Write 825
DQ Mixed 595
479% 665 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 172%
Great: 331%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 36.8
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 8 144 15.5" 1920 1009 BOE084D
Typical Crawler E30 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Crawler E30

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback