Asus ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 353%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 416%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics316% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive411% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '23 at 22:42
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$290
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 211
2-Core 416
122% 236 Pts
4-Core 811
8-Core 1,591
142% 1,201 Pts
64-Core 2,705
167% 2,705 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 117%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$958
Nvidia(10DE 167D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3180 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Lighting 481
Reflection 452
Parallax 523
392% 485 fps
MRender 580
Gravity 388
Splatting 278
324% 416 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 316%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2196 2125 2123 2093 2099 2130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
411% Outstanding
Read 2,893
Write 2,667
Mixed 3,024
SusWrite 2,128
603% 2,678 MB/s
4K Read 73.5
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 96.7
333% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,505
DQ Write 1,285
DQ Mixed 1,388
1,042% 1,392 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 411%
Great: 477%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
143GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 273 274 273 273 273 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 481
Mixed 431
SusWrite 293
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 52.5
191% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 237
215% 327 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 113%
Great: 118%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
198GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 907 646 645 645 644 622 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,971
Write 1,744
Mixed 972
SusWrite 685
299% 1,343 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 62.4
236% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,116
DQ Write 1,396
DQ Mixed 909
782% 1,140 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 249%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-16 KF552C40-16 KF548C38-16 KF548C38-16 64GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
165% Outstanding
MC Read 65.6
MC Write 55.4
MC Mixed 57.7
170% 59.6 GB/s
SC Read 56.5
SC Write 60.7
SC Mixed 55.1
164% 57.4 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 165%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 60 27.5" 2194 1163 SAM0B80 U28D590
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback