Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 234%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 261%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211220
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 01 '23 at 21:49
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 202
2-Core 406
119% 230 Pts
4-Core 821
8-Core 1,512
140% 1,167 Pts
64-Core 2,404
149% 2,404 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
205% Outstanding
Lighting 303
Reflection 284
Parallax 315
247% 301 fps
MRender 340
Gravity 241
Splatting 180
199% 254 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 205%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M500_MTFDDAT480MAV 480GB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 354 328 332 284 282 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83% Excellent
Read 379
Write 365
Mixed 313
SusWrite 323
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 31.9
112% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 181
169% 260 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83%
Great: 91%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
78GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 436 439 454 429 427 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 372
Write 436
Mixed 358
SusWrite 431
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 46.9
148% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 153
168% 284 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
42GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 252 255 263 249 248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 334
Write 370
Mixed 329
SusWrite 250
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 40
132% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 228
171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 131%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 149 148 147 144 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 160
Write 153
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 147
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 88%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4W.M16FE1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 34.7
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 29.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 13 240 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F51 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 9,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback