bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2358 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '23 at 21:15
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 272
84% 158 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 811
83% 672 Pts
64-Core 840
52% 840 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405)
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.16.7.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 62.7
2% 24.3 fps
MRender 52.3
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 54.4
43% 52.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 16%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 64GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,535
Write 1,252
Mixed 1419
312% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 65
222% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 88.1
68% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 29.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 26
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 4% 47 176 40 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback