Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 123 54% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 377 39% 313 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.8% Poor	Lighting 25.1 Reflection 52.4 Parallax 39.7 20% 39.1 fps	MRender 54.3 Gravity 30.6 Splatting 38.6 33% 41.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 663GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 340 336 351 344 343 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 375 Write 336 Mixed 322 SusWrite 339 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 36 117% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 40.4 DQ Write 81.4 DQ Mixed 53.1 43% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 137%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 7,893 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4GB free Firmware: SBFA15.5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 312 Write 133 Mixed 178 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 18.2 69% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.7 DQ Write 20.7 DQ Mixed 22.1 18% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 342GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 116 105 107 109 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 159 Write 166 Mixed 35 SusWrite 110 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 107%
WD Elements 2621 1TB 6,342 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 162GB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 79 78 78 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 105 Write 94.8 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 77.9 111% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.3 155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 66%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 191GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 83 81 83 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 172 Write 161 Mixed 96.8 SusWrite 82 165% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 67%
WDC WD15 EARS-60MVWB0 1.5TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 309GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 83 81 83 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 82.2 Write 83.3 Mixed 69.1 SusWrite 81.8 108% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 4,160 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.9% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10.2 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 92.5 43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 46: 0P 5R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
46%	18%	67	201	57	75	21.5"	1280 720	PHLC154 PHL 223V7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	157x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	111x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	65x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	24x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	11x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $514

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16