Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_A516JA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_A516JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JAB
Memory9.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210719
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 01 '23 at 14:06
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 94.4
36% 62 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 237
24% 194 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 1F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 7.6
6% 6.07 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 8.6
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane H10 with SSD 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.36
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 405
Write 496
Mixed 280
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 18.6
78% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 188
146% 200 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Kingston 9905700-101.A00G 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.6% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 21 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_A516JA Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_A516JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback