bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH77KC
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '23 at 11:02
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 169
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 286
36% 276 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Intel(8086 2031) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 257
Write 246
Mixed 239
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 37.1
124% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 108
107% 171 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 31 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback