User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 01 '23 at 06:30
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 163
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 629
55% 469 Pts
64-Core 1,270
79% 1,270 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.21023.2010
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 88.1
Reflection 136
Parallax 166
72% 130 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 91.1
Splatting 160
122% 149 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A 250GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 99 103 112 110 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 321
Write 132
Mixed 188
SusWrite 110
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 12.7
68% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 45.7
74% 152 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MG08ACA1 16TB
8TB free
Firmware: 4002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 162 169 186 181 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 62% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8320.C8FD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 GSM57E1 E2260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback