User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '23 at 05:06
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 168
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 636
57% 482 Pts
64-Core 1,271
79% 1,271 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 88.1
Reflection 137
Parallax 170
72% 132 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 92.4
Splatting 160
121% 147 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A 250GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 119 114 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 304
Write 145
Mixed 202
SusWrite 119
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 12.9
70% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 24.7
DQ Mixed 45
73% 152 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MG08ACA1 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: 4002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 116 176 248 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 127
Mixed 90.9
SusWrite 164
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8320.C8FD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback