Daten LUNAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDaten LUNAR  (all builds)
MotherboardDaten GM5AGEO
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220621
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 22:31
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 70.3
1-Core 181
2-Core 345
104% 199 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,005
104% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,416
88% 1,416 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Device(1D05 1178) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
62.6% Good
Lighting 83.6
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 71.6
68% 77.2 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 61
Splatting 59.7
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10380 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1852 432 271 278 260 257 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,977
Write 2,523
Mixed 1,677
SusWrite 558
378% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 91.2
300% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 563
580% 958 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 258%
Great: 520%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WSW18S8EVD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 38.1
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 24.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 31.5" 1920 1009 CHD0320 PMG32C900FG
Typical LUNAR Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Daten LUNAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback