MSI Z97 PC Mate(MS-7850)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7850
MotherboardMSI Z97 PC Mate(MS-7850)  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 21:42
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 417
55% 415 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 62.4
Parallax 88.4
53% 72 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 46.5
48% 61 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 250 78 89 81 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 452
Write 228
Mixed 325
SusWrite 166
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 38.6
148% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 199
171% 249 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 90%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
200GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 450 461 467 468 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 462
Mixed 400
SusWrite 453
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 52.6
176% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 286
237% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 182 181 181 182 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 135
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 181
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 1302 1866 CL10 Series Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 20.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 6 60 27" 1280 720 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical Z97 PC Mate(MS-7850) Builds (Compare 3,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 PC Mate(MS-7850) - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback