Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 21:15
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 165
2-Core 332
105% 196 Pts
4-Core 662
8-Core 1,298
116% 980 Pts
64-Core 2,277
141% 2,277 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 49%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 1TB
491GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1450 1425 1460 1466 1351 1475 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,305
Write 1,516
Mixed 1,387
SusWrite 1,438
319% 1,411 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 91.1
305% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,375
DQ Write 1194
DQ Mixed 1,280
960% 1,283 MB/s
Poor: 276%
This bench: 292%
Great: 606%
Netac 1TB 1TB
623GB free
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 438 446 446 447 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 435
Mixed 421
SusWrite 447
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 28.6
140% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 39.3
87% 171 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 100%
Great: 102%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
39GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,389
Write 859
Mixed 603
209% 950 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 35.2
175% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 889
DQ Mixed 713
526% 676 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 223%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
847GB free
Firmware: MKAONS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 110
Write 104
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 85.6
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST10000VN0008-2JJ101 10TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 219 222 222 221 231 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA45UH-MEC1U22T3 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 67.7
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 35.6
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 34.8
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback