PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | Asus P10S-X Series (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK P10S-X Series |
Memory | 26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20170314 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 30 '23 at 16:41 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
64.7%
Good
|
71% 126 Pts
|
40% 295 Pts
|
19% 305 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45%
Average
|
44% 57.9 fps
|
46% 57.6 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel SSDSC2KB240G8 240GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XCV10100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 235 242 257 261 263 MB/s
|
61.9%
Good
|
56% 249 MB/s
|
76% 26.5 MB/s
|
193% 271 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung HD105SI 1TB
114GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 83 83 83 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
43% 57.6 MB/s
|
179% 1.3 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
442GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 118 120 120 119 MB/s
|
65.3%
Good
|
72% 98 MB/s
|
160% 1.13 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
404GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 122 124 124 123 MB/s
|
67.3%
Good
|
75% 102 MB/s
|
171% 1.17 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
71.7%
Very good
|
73% 25.6 GB/s
|
61% 21.5 GB/s
|
50% 80.3 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 30 | 72.3" | 1280 720 | GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E3-1240 v5IntelBench 77%, 2,434 samples | 3x |
Xeon E3-1230 v5IntelBench 77%, 2,254 samples | 3x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 2x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $92 |