MSI MS-17F3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF75 Thin 10SDR
MotherboardMSI MS-17F3  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 10:50
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 196
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 481
54% 425 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12A7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.1 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 8.5
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ5 512GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 52 63 75 88 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 625
Write 506
Mixed 546
SusWrite 105
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 33.6
104% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 658
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 169
182% 319 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 149%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.8% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 20
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO978F
Typical MS-17F3 Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback